On 22 April 2010 20:02, Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> wrote: > It's an irritating problem. We've run into the same problem in our internal > proprietary pipelining system - soon to be enhanced w/xproc support I hope > :). Does this point to some sort of regex step, or should that be taken as an aspect of XSLT2.0? Perhaps just a URI-escaping step, extension or Version + 1? If it's causing fun and games.... regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.ukReceived on Friday, 23 April 2010 06:42:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 April 2010 06:42:47 GMT