W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2010

Re: EXProc - editorial: use different prefixes for File Utils and XPath functions

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:53:21 +0100
Message-ID: <h2gebaca5bf1004220353qb20e6c76m5cb8ec47e780dbdd@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
On 22 April 2010 09:36, ? wrote:

> I noticed that the specifications at EXProc.org use the same namespace
> prefix for the File Utils steps and the XPath extension functions: "pxf"

> I think that for reducing the confusion of the readers/users, it would
> be better to use a different prefix for either the File Utils stuff or
> the XPath extension functions.

  Well, that's a tricky one.  If we get too much different namespaces,
people will just be confused.  If we do not have enough, things will
be less maintainable.  Personally, I think it is better to have too
less than too much, but that's just my own point of view.


Florent Georges
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:55:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:06 UTC