Re: Detecting unbound options

James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes:
> I think adding relevent default values per step represents the 'least
> change' though if its really problematic then implentators can address
> in the short term; as for delaying the spec ... I think its time to
> let the 'cows make the paths' then let v+1 pave em over.

I hear you. I definitely don't want to delay the spec, but I am
concerned that this issue is a pretty critical language use problem.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The irrational is not necessarily
http://nwalsh.com/            | unreasonable.--Sir Lewis Namier