W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Detecting unbound options

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:06:50 -0400
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m2prduy70l.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes:
>> Yuck! But can we really live with this...
> For sure not.
> The most straightforward approach would be to add p:bound? as an XPath
> extension function.

Alas, I think that would just trade a great big nested p:try/p:catch
for a great big p:choose...

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Part of thinking is its cruelty, aside
http://nwalsh.com/            | from its contents. It is the process of
                              | detachment from everything else, the
                              | ripping, the wrenching, the sharpness
                              | of cutting.--Elias Canetti

Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:07:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:05 UTC