W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Detecting unbound options

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:51:47 +0200
Message-ID: <21d9ade60905262251l14ea26f4ha17dc2655f31de59@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Dave,

I was thinking that @required='true' on the p:option fulfills the
requirement you're talking about, wasn't it ?

Xmlizer

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/5/27 mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>:
>> Norm,
>>
>> Are you suggesting that we eventually end up needing a construct to
>> test if a variable is bounded ?
>
>
> It would be very useful for users.
> Saves a user having to write scripts to go chasing every variable and ensure
> it is defined and set?
>
> Ant does not do this and it's a real nuisance!
>
> regards
>
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> Docbook FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 06:06:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 May 2009 06:06:29 GMT