W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Thoughts on cx:zip

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:28:16 +0100
Message-ID: <711a73df0905261228y435b292cpcad9463a304df8d0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2009/5/26 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>:
> Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
>>> The idea is that the manifest says what to do. The step takes the
>>> documents identified by the @href's in the manifest and puts them in
>>> the zip file with the names specified by the @name's.
>>
>> -1, but only if you are considering the idea of XSLT style variables?
>> Using indirection via a manifest I lose the ability to list out the
>> files using variables which the implementation has resolved?
>> How to get dir/dir/*.xml ?


>From which I gather you don't support the idea
of using variables as per XSLT?

A manifest would kill it altogether.

So no indirection in xproc?

That kills xproc as a stand in for ant then AFAICT.

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 19:28:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 May 2009 19:28:50 GMT