W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2009

Re: XProc questions from my students

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:56:30 +0200
Message-ID: <21d9ade60905200256l7091a3atc31d57eba6354514@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Cc: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote:
> 2. Why is it an error to include p:output in an atomic step?

Your are allowed to use p:output in the "signature" of a step

When you use it, then connection is made by the steps that "reads
from" this port

It was a choice to make
* having only "input"
* having only "output"
* havign both

the WG decided to stick to "input" only since it doesn't remove features

Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 09:57:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:05 UTC