re p:compare non primary output

• From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
• Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:40:57 +0100
• To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0903281140j6de67490yb2149a492074de94@mail.gmail.com>

wondering if p:compare p:output should really be non-primary ... from
a DWIM pov I think that we will want to 80% of the time use a result

thx for considering, Jim Fuller

Received on Saturday, 28 March 2009 18:41:32 UTC