W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > March 2009

example given in section 2.1.1, need clarification

From: Raphaël Burgener <raphael.burgener@epfl.ch>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:30:59 +0100
Message-ID: <49B58A93.2010808@epfl.ch>
To: xproc-dev@w3.org

Hello everyone,

I don't understand the example given in section "2.1.1 Step names". Why 
does the p:choose get the name "!1.2" ? "!1.1" seems to be more coherent.

-Raph

Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 09:19:12 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com: "RE: example given in section 2.1.1, need clarification"
Previous message: Norman Walsh: "Announce: XML Calabash 0.9.5"
Next in thread: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com: "RE: example given in section 2.1.1, need clarification"
Reply: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com: "RE: example given in section 2.1.1, need clarification"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 March 2009 09:19:13 GMT