W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > June 2009

[closed] Re: Follow-up question wrt the previous post

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:20:15 -0400
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m2prd2ekgg.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes:
> But since XProc options are always string-valued, there's no obvious
> default which can be reliably distinguished from a supplied value.

The WG agreed to add an XPath extension function for this purpose.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | What is familiar is what we are used
http://nwalsh.com/            | to; and what we are used to is most
                              | difficult to 'Know'--that is, to see as
                              | a problem; that is, to see as strange,
                              | as distant, as 'outside us'.-- Nietzsche

Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 19:20:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 17 June 2009 19:20:55 GMT