W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > June 2009

Re: XProc Best Practice: favor XProc primitive steps over XSLT and Schematron?

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:15:01 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0906150515k4624e755oe9c375897d05eb2f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Cc: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Costello, Roger L.<costello@mitre.org> wrote:
> Hi Folk,
> One way to implement an XProc pipeline is to simply call XSLT (using p:xslt) and have a stylesheet do the work. Or, call Schematron to do the work.
> Alternatively, the work could be done using the basic XProc steps.
> What's best practice? Should the basic XProc steps be favored over escaping to XSLT or Schematron?

as for your specific question I think a number of ancillary questions
could be asked to help qualify, for example:

* is streaming important ? if so, you might find the native xproc
solution more amenable to streaming then xslt/schematron based

* should I embed rules within xproc (as in the native xproc solution)
?  How will this effect maintenance of rules?

w/o wanting to sound snarky ... I don't think there is much in the way
of  best practice just quite yet with XProc, still early days ...
though good to discuss.

cheers, Jim Fuller
Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 12:15:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:05 UTC