W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > July 2009

RE: Difficulty overriding parameter values

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:41:27 -0400
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC787101489F1@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <xproc-dev@w3.org>
In our implementation it works. But perhaps it is a bug, I will have to
check.
 
Regards,
Vojtech


________________________________

	From: xproc-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xproc-dev-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Kevin Flynn
	Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 1:22 PM
	To: xproc-dev@w3.org
	Subject: Re: Difficulty overriding parameter values
	
	
	Yes, I understand that, but if I actually need to explicitly
bind one of the ports like this:
	
	      <p:input port="source">
	        <p:document href="import.ebp"/>
	      </p:input>
	
	how do I do it?
	
	Regards,
	
	Kevin
	
	Toman_Vojtech@emc.com wrote: 

		When you use p:pipeline, you automatically get 'source',
'result' and 'parameters' ports. That is why you get the XS0011 errors.
		 
		Regards,
		Vojtech


________________________________

			From: xproc-dev-request@w3.org
[mailto:xproc-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Flynn
			Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 12:22 PM
			To: xproc-dev@w3.org
			Subject: Re: Difficulty overriding parameter
values
			
			

			Well, I run into other problems then:
			
			Error  : XS0011: Duplicate port name: source
			Error  : XS0011: Duplicate port name: parameters
			Error  : XS0011: Duplicate port name: result
			
			and I need to be able to declare the source port
so I can bind it to my source file.
			
			I'll send a mail to Norman Walsh.
			
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 11:42:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 3 July 2009 11:42:29 GMT