- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 07:01:16 -0400
- To: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On Wednesday, July 29, 2009, Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> wrote: > > It also might be nice if an HTTP server reporting "text/plain" (no > character set) didn't override the client specification of "text/plain; > windows/1252", since they don't in fact conflict: the server is simply > providing less information. I believe, though it isn't convenient for me to check right now, that the absence of an encoding decl in an http response is a declaration that the text is US-ASCII. > > -Mike > > Norman Walsh wrote: > > "Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes: > > > Um. What kind of filesystem are you using that tells you the content > type? > > > > I suppose, on reflection, that that gives me justification to ignore > the content type reported by java.net.URL. There really isn't a server > involved. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 1 August 2009 11:01:57 UTC