W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

[closed] Re: example given in section 2.1.1, need clarification

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:28:20 -0400
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m263gxqxxn.fsf_-_@nwalsh.com>
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> I don't understand the example given in section "2.1.1 Step 
>> names". Why 
>> does the p:choose get the name "!1.2" ? "!1.1" seems to be 
>> more coherent.
>
> I think you are right and p:choose should indeed get the name "!1.1".
> The example pipeline used to look different in the older versions of the
> spec, and the text in section 2.1.1 should be updated to be in-sync
> again.

Yes. Fixed now, thanks.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A moment's insight is sometimes worth a
http://nwalsh.com/            | life's experience.--Oliver Wendell
                              | Holmes

Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 01:29:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 April 2009 01:29:05 GMT