W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [closed] Re: XProc test http-request-005

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:24:28 +0200
Message-ID: <ebaca5bf0904140724m1b0b76acr6b280fb6b9d0af1@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2009/4/14 Norman Walsh wrote:
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:

>> I'm fixing the same bugs in fixed-alternative and http-request-006 now :-)

> I think I've fixed http-request-006 now. The CR/LF pair that precedes
> the separator is, by my reading of the RFC, part of the separator.
> There's also some confusion (in my mind) about how to handle the
> text->XML conversion of CR/LF pairs.

  I think you can have everything you want (except the boundary) in
the content of one part.  But for header lines, and for boundaries,
when the RFC speaks about a line, or a blank line, you have to use
CR/LF as line delimiter (not only LF.)  But to enable
interoperability, I wonder if one has to translate LF <-> CR/LF on
Unices for textual media types.

  But my point was that at very least, the end of line for headers and
boundaries must be CR/LF (and were only LF.)  Seems fixed now.


Florent Georges
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 14:25:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC