Re: NVDL?

James Garriss <james@garriss.org> writes:

> I apologize for being johnny-come-lately, but has the WG considered support
> for NVDL, either in this version or the next version of XProc?
>
> http://nvdl.org/
>
> Given support for all the other validation languages, NVDL seems like a
> logical fit to me.

We've talked about it, but I don't think any of us are expert enough
to tell if XProc can already handle all of NVDL or if we'd need a
p:nvdl step.

At this point, I think it's not likely to make it into V1.0. But if
someone knows what needs to be done, I'd love to hear about it.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It'll cost you.
http://nwalsh.com/            |