- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:19:59 -0400
- To: James Garriss <james@garriss.org>
- Cc: "xproc-dev\@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m21vzgs268.fsf@nwalsh.com>
James Garriss <james@garriss.org> writes:
> Excellent. My mistake was assuming that p:compare had a primary output.
> What should have tipped me off as I read the spec? Is it that primary
> equals false? From the spec:
Yep, primary=false is the flag.
> <p:declare-step type="p:compare">
> <p:input port="source" primary="true"/>
> <p:input port="alternate"/>
> <p:output port="result" primary="false"/>
> <p:option name="fail-if-not-equal" select="'false'"/> <!--
> boolean -->
> </p:declare-step>
>
> As to a working solution, you had the right idea, but as calabash informs
> us: Attribute "step" not allowed on p:output. Instead, we can put a result
> port in p:compare, like such:
>
> <p:compare fail-if-not-equal="true" name="compareBookstores">
> <p:input port="source">
> <p:pipe step="main" port="source"/>
> </p:input>
> <p:input port="alternate">
> <p:pipe step="main" port="alternate"/>
> </p:input>
> <p:output port="result"/>
> </p:compare>
No, that's not right. You aren't allowed to put a p:output on an atomic
step. Does Calabash miss that too? Sigh. Another day, another bug :-)
The output port is part of the declaration of the p:compare step.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A proof tells us where to concentrate
http://nwalsh.com/ | our doubts.-- Anonymous
Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 13:20:41 UTC