W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > December 2008

[closed] Re: declaring an atomic step

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:38:02 -0500
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m21vw399zp.fsf_-_@nwalsh.com>
"James Sulak" <jsulak@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks, Norm, that makes sense.  I'm finding that the difference
> between atomic steps and compound steps is one of the more confusing
> bits of the spec.

Hmm. I'm open to suggestions for spec improvement.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | No man is more than another if he does
http://nwalsh.com/            | no more than another.-- Cervantes

Received on Friday, 19 December 2008 20:38:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC