W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > December 2008

Re: Schematron for xproc validation

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:54:09 +0000
Message-ID: <711a73df0812150254y770cb5ey2b78e50571647ce9@mail.gmail.com>
To: "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>

2008/12/15 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>:
> "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
>> I think Schematron could do a good job, but listing the 'rules' could
>> take a while!
> I think Schematron could do it, but I agree, some of the rules would
> be pretty hairy. I find RNG validation covers enough of the common
> errors to be sufficient for my needs.

Compare our positions Norm :-)

I guess I'm more representative of new users than you?

E.g. pipeline, six steps, works OK on default
  Then I introduce a variable after the third step
(xslt background).
  It all falls apart!

I think Schematron could handle the subtleties.


Dave Pawson
Docbook FAQ.
Received on Monday, 15 December 2008 10:54:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC