- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:32:18 -0500
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 12 December 2008 16:33:00 UTC
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
>> In Calabash, if you pass a binding for that port on the command line,
>> that's what it gets bound to. If you pass parameters on the command
>> line, Calabash manufactures a c:parameter-set with those parameters
>> and that's what it gets bound to. If you do neither of those, it gets
>> bound to an empty sequence.
>
> c: being a calabash extension ?
No, c: being the standard step result namespace. Just like what you'd
get out of a p:parameters step.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A great deal may be done by severity,
http://nwalsh.com/ | more by love, but most by clear
| discernment and impartial
| justice.--Goethe
Received on Friday, 12 December 2008 16:33:00 UTC