W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > December 2008

Re: calabash: redefining standard step

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:02:19 -0500
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m24p1ar984.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> Looking at http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/#f.step-available
> Function: boolean p:step-available(string step-type)
> How do I say that I want to know if foreign:stepName is available?
> Is 'String' sufficient for that parameter Norm?
> Surely p:stepName and foreign:stepName should be
> different by your previous logic?

It's a string, but:

   The step-type string must have the form of a QName; the QName is
   expanded into a name using the namespace declarations in scope for
   the expression.

it's turned into a QName, so the prefix is irrelevant.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If a little knowledge is dangerous,
http://nwalsh.com/            | where is the man who has so much as to
                              | be out of danger?--Thomas. H. Huxley

Received on Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:03:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC