W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Included <schema>

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:56:09 +0000
To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
Cc: George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bsj51bpqe.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Mukul Gandhi writes:

> Hi George,
>     The XSD 1.1 spec at the same place mentions only this,
>
> <quote>
> 1.2 It resolves to a <schema> element information item in a well-formed
> information set.
>  </quote>
>
> The 1.1 spec doesn't say "which in turn corresponds to a valid schema."
>
> I think, with an XSD 1.1 processor test.xsd would correspond to a valid
> schema. With both XSD 1.1 and 1.0, m.xsd in isolation would be invalid
> (since the element reference, <xs:element ref="a"/> within it cannot be
> resolved).

Not so -- see my response.

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:56:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:56:38 GMT