Re: phantom attribute?

  Hi David,

Which version of Java are you using? Which distribution - Sun, IBM or 
Oracle?

Not sure what Oracle uses as an XML parser. IBM uses Xerces. Newer 
versions of Sun JDK (1.5 and 1.6) use a version Xerces. If it's an older 
version of Sun JDK (1.4 or older), then it might be using the old 
Crimson parser.

Kind regards,
Eric

On 9/29/2010 6:52 PM, David McBride wrote:
> I'm using the javax and org.xml.sax java classes.  Specifically, I'm using
> DocumentBuilder to parse the XML.
>
> Weirdly, though, I also created a perl test harness
> (XML::Validator::Schema), which does not throw the exception, even though
> both are supposedly W3C compliant.
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:nrm@arcanedomain.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 2:10 PM
> To: David McBride
> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: Re: phantom attribute?
>
> David:  I don't have an answer, but I suspect it would help if you
> indicated which parser you used, and any other such details that might
> affect what you're seeing.  Thank you.
>
> Noah
>
> On 9/29/2010 3:48 PM, David McBride wrote:
>> I'm seeing some odd behavior when I parse XML with the schema that I just
>> developed. In particular, there are two elements, 'signal' and 'method',
>> which may contain an element, 'arg'. In the case of 'method', the element
>> 'arg' may have a 'direction' attribute. However, in the case of 'signal',
>> the 'arg' element may NOT have a 'direction' attribute.
>>
>> I've represented this in my schema, as follows:
>>
>> <xs:complexType name="signal_arg_type">
>>
>> <xs:sequence>
>>
>> <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" ref="annotation"/>
>>
>> </xs:sequence>
>>
>> <xs:attribute ref="name"/>
>>
>> <xs:attribute name="type" type="arg_and_property_type" use="required"/>
>>
>> </xs:complexType>
>>
>> <xs:complexType name="method_arg_type">
>>
>> <xs:attribute ref="name"/>
>>
>> <xs:attribute name="type" type="arg_and_property_type" use="required"/>
>>
>> <xs:attribute default="in" name="direction" type="arg_direction"/>
>>
>> </xs:complexType>
>>
>> <xs:element name="method">
>>
>> <xs:complexType>
>>
>> <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0">
>>
>> <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" ref="annotation"/>
>>
>> <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="arg"
>> type="method_arg_type"/>
>>
>> </xs:choice>
>>
>> <xs:attribute ref="name" use="required"/>
>>
>> </xs:complexType>
>>
>> </xs:element>
>>
>> <xs:element name="signal">
>>
>> <xs:complexType>
>>
>> <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0">
>>
>> <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="arg"
>> type="signal_arg_type"/>
>>
>> <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" ref="annotation"/>
>>
>> </xs:choice>
>>
>> <xs:attribute ref="name" use="required"/>
>>
>> </xs:complexType>
>>
>> </xs:element>
>>
>> Strangely enough, when I parse XML with signal elements, I end up with
>> SAXParseExceptions that say that the 'arg' element in 'signal' is not
>> allowed to have a 'direction' attribute, even though the xml that caused
>> the exception does not contain the 'direction' attribute!! For example,
>> here is one of the elements that causes the exception:
>>
>> <signal name="DeviceAdded">
>>
>> <arg name="udi" type="s"/>
>>
>> </signal>
>>
>> As you can see, there's no 'direction' attribute. How is it possible that
>> my parser could be throwing these exceptions, given the schema that I
>> described above?!
>>
>> Thanks, in advance, for any feedback.
>>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.856 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3166 - Release Date: 09/29/10 01:37:00
>