W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Are these two datetime values equivalent?

From: Kevin Braun <kbraun@obj-sys.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:23:09 -0400
Message-ID: <4A71C8ED.3010306@obj-sys.com>
To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
CC: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

24 isn't a valid hour (see part 2, D.2.1)

On 7/30/2009 12:10 PM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>    Are these equivalent:
>
>    2009-07-29T24:00:00-6:00
>    2009-07-30T00:00:00-6:00
>
> /Roger
>
>

Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 16:24:32 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andrew Welch: "Re: Are these two datetime values equivalent?"
Previous message: Costello, Roger L.: "Are these two datetime values equivalent?"
In reply to: Costello, Roger L.: "Are these two datetime values equivalent?"
Next in thread: Michael Kay: "RE: Are these two datetime values equivalent?"
Reply: Michael Kay: "RE: Are these two datetime values equivalent?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 30 July 2009 16:24:32 GMT