Re: Differences in derivation by extension of complex types between Schema 1.0 and 1.1 from Tobias Koenig on 2009-02-19 (xmlschema-dev@w3.org from February 2009)

From: Tobias Koenig <tobias.koenig@trolltech.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:01:24 +0100
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-Id: <200902191801.24876.tobias.koenig@trolltech.com>

On Thursday 19 February 2009 17:40:00 Kevin Braun wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
Hej Kevin,

> You are right, it wouldn't make sense for the derived type to have empty 
> content.  However, I think that the result is that it makes the derived 
> type an invalid extension, according to 3.4.6.2, and I suspect that is 
> the purpose.
Right, so as that schema comes from the schema-test-suite and is marked
as valid there, I'll submit a bug report against it.

Thank you very much for brainstorming! :)

Ciao,
Tobias

Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 17:01:52 UTC