W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Differences in derivation by extension of complex types between Schema 1.0 and 1.1

From: Tobias Koenig <tobias.koenig@trolltech.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:01:24 +0100
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-Id: <200902191801.24876.tobias.koenig@trolltech.com>
On Thursday 19 February 2009 17:40:00 Kevin Braun wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
Hej Kevin,

> You are right, it wouldn't make sense for the derived type to have empty 
> content.  However, I think that the result is that it makes the derived 
> type an invalid extension, according to, and I suspect that is 
> the purpose.
Right, so as that schema comes from the schema-test-suite and is marked
as valid there, I'll submit a bug report against it.

Thank you very much for brainstorming! :)

Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 17:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:15 UTC