Hej, there are the two schemas 1) <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xsd:element name="doc" type="foo"/> <xsd:complexType name="foo"> <xsd:complexContent> <xsd:restriction base="bar"> <xsd:choice> <xsd:element name="e1" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="0"/> <xsd:element name="e2"/> </xsd:choice> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:complexContent> </xsd:complexType> <xsd:complexType name="bar"> <xsd:choice> <xsd:element name="e1"/> <xsd:element name="e2"/> </xsd:choice> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:schema> 2) <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xs:complexType name="base"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="e1" type="xs:string" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="derived"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="base"> <xs:choice minOccurs="0"> <xs:element name="e1" type="xs:string" /> </xs:choice> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema> In both cases a complex type with emptiable particle derives by restriction from a complex type with non-emptiable particle. However the first schema is valid according to xml schema test suite (and saxon validator) but the second is not. So what is the real issue in the second schema? That a choice particle is inherited from an sequence particle? Thanks in advance Ciao, TobiasReceived on Monday, 2 February 2009 10:34:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 March 2009 11:13:43 GMT