W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > August 2009

RE: Unqualified elment - but still have prefix at the root

From: Simon Cox <simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:20:29 +0200
To: "'Avihaimar'" <avihaimar@yahoo.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A4F67D63377B4A63A2C5D9DF8D30C564@H07.jrc.it>
The key point is that because your document uses elements from two
namespaces, an instance document with no namespace prefixes at all is
invalid. The 'no prefix' can only be used by one namespace, not both. 


--------------------------------------------------------
Simon Cox

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 
Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 
Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit, TP 262 
Via E. Fermi, 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy 
Tel: +39 0332 78 3652
Fax: +39 0332 78 6325
mailto:simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu 
http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/simon-cox 

SDI Unit: http://sdi.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ 
IES Institute: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
JRC: http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
--------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Avihaimar
Sent: Tuesday, 25 August 2009 14:49
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: Re: Unqualified elment - but still have prefix at the root


Last one - (Thank you!!!!!)


I know - i can handle this XML with any prefix. Its depend on the
declaration in the header (xlmns).

But,

XML without any prefix will failed in validation . I want to have the option
to not have prefix at all and i dont know how can i do this either by
chanigng the xsd or the instance.

When i send example of XML to the cutomers i want to send them XML with no
prefix and i didnt success to have one by chanigng the xsd or the instance.



Avihaimar wrote:
> 
> Hey,
> 
> i have two schemas A,B. 
> B import A. 
> Both of them defined as unqualified element, but the xml that 
> generated from B has n1: as a prefix for the root elements.
> Is there a way to have no prefix at all? 
> 
> Thank you
> 

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Unqualified-elment---but-still-have-prefix-at-the-root
-tp25123070p25133549.html
Sent from the w3.org - xmlschema-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 13:21:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:15:14 GMT