- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:19:57 -0400
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Slide 50:
"If I had placed the assertion on the <Para> element my XPath expression
would need to "look up" to the <Document> element (parent). That's not
allowed. It's an error, in fact."
Nope, it's not an error, at least not in the eyes of a schema processor.
It won't do what you want, but it's not a violation of the constraints on
schemas and it results in no error indication in the PSVI. What happens
is that the XPath looking up to find the "Document" won't find it. That's
because the assertion is validated with the <Para> were the root of the
XPath data model; for this purpose, <Para> has no ancestors.
I think it would be better to say:
"If I had placed the assertion on the <Para> element my XPath expression
would need to "look up" to the <Document> element (parent). In fact, that
won't do what you want. The <para> is the root for the XPath evaluation,
so the XPath won't even see the <Document> element." Or some such.
Noah
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
"Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Sent by: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
08/08/2009 01:27 PM
To: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
Subject: [Update #2] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial
Hi Folks,
Here are the updates I made to the XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial:
1. I received many excellent comments and
incorporated them.
2. I created 20 lab exercises. I recommend
working the exercises as you read through
the tutorial.
Here is the updated tutorial:
http://www.xfront.com/xml-schema-1-1/xml-schema-1-1.ppt
Here is the updated tutorial + labs + examples:
http://www.xfront.com/xml-schema-1-1/xml-schema-1-1.zip
As always, please let me know if there is anything in the tutorial that is
unclear or if you find a typo.
/Roger
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 15:20:45 UTC