- From: Mary Holstege <holstege@mathling.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:52:02 -0700
- To: "Mark Hansen" <mark@agileitinc.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:23:01 -0700, Mark Hansen <mark@agileitinc.com> wrote: > > SCDs look good. How much change to you anticipate to this Working > Draft? The next draft will be substantially reorganized and the exposition changed. From the POV of what a SCD looks like, very little is changing, although there will be additions to accomodate new XML Schema 1.1 components. //Mary > C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote: >> >> >> On 9 Jul 2008, at 13:20 , Mark Hansen wrote: >> >>> >>> Is there a standard syntax for generating references to anonymous >>> types? I know that XML Schema 1.0 does not provide such a standard. >>> Will there be one in XML Schema 1.1 - or in some other, related, >>> standard? >> >> I'd use SCDs. >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/ >> >> But note that this is still a Working Draft, and still changing. >> >> --Michael Sperberg-McQueen >> >>
Received on Friday, 18 July 2008 22:52:40 UTC