> > It goes without saying that I've very disappointed the > xs:override proposal as pushed off for 1.1--that would have > made things so much easier. But I certainly understand the > pressures that require those sorts of hard decisions to be > made. I, and the entire DITA community, certainly appreciate > the effort made in putting the proposal forward. Since the specification of xs:override is essentially to include a transformed schema document, isn't it something that could be implemented in a preprocessor? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 16:28:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 March 2009 11:13:39 GMT