I agree, unluckily the xsi:nil construct is present in many schemas and the 'null' concept has multiple syntaxes [1][2]... Michele Vivoda [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Apr/0033 [2] Cfr issue 37 on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Aug/0000 [3] Issue 15 cited in [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/issues/15/ --- Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ha scritto: > Almost everything connected with xsi:nil, including > the very existence of > the construct, is counter-intuitive. Best just to > ignore it. It was a > misguided attempt to force-fit a concept from the > relational model into the > XML model where it isn't needed. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ > > > ___________________________________ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.htmlReceived on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 03:15:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 March 2009 11:13:39 GMT