W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > May 2007

RE: redefining base element integer

From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 22:35:23 +0100
To: "'Willi Weichselbaumer'" <williweichselbaumer@hotmail.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <016001c7a239$4423f030$6401a8c0@turtle>
You can define these types using list or union in the way I suggested. You
don't need to redefine the schema types to achieve this. These types are
different types, in a different namespace, that can be defined in their own
schema.
 
I think the XForms draft is pretty defective in the way these types are
defined (the XSLT/XQuery groups have raised a formal comment saying so) but
there's nothing to stop you defining them.
 
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


  _____  

From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Willi Weichselbaumer
Sent: 29 May 2007 21:59
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: RE: redefining base element integer


Hi Michael,
 
I was trying to make my own style sheet to allow for the XForms data types
that allow empty content, therefore extending the XML definition.
 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xforms11-20061103/#empty-content-types
 
 
Do you have any other ideas?
 
Thanks,
Willi
 
 


  _____  

Explore the seven wonders of the world Learn more!
<http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE>  
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:35:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:59 GMT