W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Defining recursive elements?

From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:48:37 +0200
To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070518064837.GA12423@karelia>
Hi Pete,

Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> writes:

> Although, just to clarify for those that are a bit fuzzy about namespaces
> in schema, commonly if people define a schema that specifies a target
> namespace, 9 times out of 10 they will also make
> elementFormDefault="qualified".

Any studies to support these numbers? I just did a quick check over
a bunch of real-world schemas in our repository. Out of 18 schemas,
7 are "unqualified" (~40%) and 11 are "qualified" (~60%).


Boris Kolpackov
Code Synthesis Tools CC
Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding

Received on Friday, 18 May 2007 06:51:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:12 UTC