- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 16:10:38 +0100
- To: "Bryce Nesbitt" <bryce1@obviously.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Thanks for the clarification. I'm afraid I'm still working out what conclusions to draw!!! Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML Schema to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx/ http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ ============================================= ----- Original Message From: "Bryce Nesbitt" > > The original poster (that's me) was drawing an analogy between Java and > XML, perhaps a little unfair. In the Java world packages outside the > core get an "x" in their name (for "experimental" or "extended") until > they are eventually folded into the core. > > For XML enums it might look like this. Imagine an enumeration > containing "schwinn", "huffy" and "specialized", then: > > <vendor>specialized</vendor> > <vendor>heffy</vendor> > <vendor>Schwinn</vendor> > <vendor enum_extension="true">breezer</vendor> > > when validated "heffy" would be invalid, but "breezer" is clearly marked > as existing outside the predefined list of bicycle manufacturers. > > > > Pete Cordell wrote: >> >> Gee, thanks. Believe it or not I had already tried that, but it didn't >> actually give me any additional insight into what the OP was suggesting. >> About as useful as suggesting: >> >> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=computer+science&btnG=Google+Search > > >
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 15:10:59 UTC