W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Schema 1.1: xs:anyEnumeration considered?

From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 16:10:38 +0100
Message-ID: <001501c78d95$39085780$4200a8c0@Codalogic>
To: "Bryce Nesbitt" <bryce1@obviously.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

Thanks for the clarification.  I'm afraid I'm still working out what 
conclusions to draw!!!

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
for XML Schema to C++ data binding visit
 http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx/
 http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/
=============================================

----- Original Message From: "Bryce Nesbitt"


>
> The original poster (that's me) was drawing an analogy between Java and
> XML, perhaps a little unfair.  In the Java world packages outside the
> core get an "x" in their name (for "experimental" or "extended") until
> they are eventually folded into the core.
>
> For XML enums it might look like this.  Imagine an enumeration
> containing "schwinn", "huffy" and "specialized", then:
>
>    <vendor>specialized</vendor>
>    <vendor>heffy</vendor>
>    <vendor>Schwinn</vendor>
>    <vendor enum_extension="true">breezer</vendor>
>
> when validated "heffy" would be invalid, but "breezer" is clearly marked
> as existing outside the predefined list of bicycle manufacturers.
>
>
>
> Pete Cordell wrote:
>>
>> Gee, thanks.  Believe it or not I had already tried that, but it didn't
>> actually give me any additional insight into what the OP was suggesting.
>> About as useful as suggesting:
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=computer+science&btnG=Google+Search
>
>
> 
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 15:10:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:59 GMT