W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Schema 1.1: xs:anyEnumeration considered?

From: brycenesbitt <bryce1@obviously.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <10278076.post@talk.nabble.com>
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org

How about something akin to "javax".  The ability to insert an extra
attribute to a non-conforming element that says "this is extended beyond the
schema".  Then you'd still catch mistakes in a standard type (e.g. "runtal"
when "rental" was meant), but still allow true extensions (e.g. "leasing").  

I like the idea of providing an enumeration, even in cases where that's just
a serving suggestion or starting point.

Pete Cordell wrote:
> One thing I often see are sets of enumerations that are not extensible....
>     <xs:simpleType name="foo">
>         <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
>             <xs:pattern value="[a-zA-Z0-0]{3,4}"/>
>             <xs:enumeration value="ABC"/>
>             <xs:enumeration value="DEFG"/>
>             <xs:anyEnumeration/>  <!-- New -->
>         </xs:restriction>
>     </xs:simpleType>

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Schema-1.1%3A-xs%3AanyEnumeration-considered--tf3415265.html#a10278076
Sent from the w3.org - xmlschema-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 23:59:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:12 UTC