> >> Trouble is, James Clark is one of those people who I would imagine is >> rarely wrong, so I thought I'd better ask! >Yes, James Clark is wrong. Of course you need to take a look at the >date of the email, which is 2002, and we are in 2007 now, so I suspect >it was accurate at the time it was written. Xerces correctly rejects >the <bar/> element when validated with the schema example provided. Really? It's been probably a full year but I could have sworn the last time I checked this thing in XSV and in some versions of XMLSpy it validated laxly? Cheers, Bryan RasmussenReceived on Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:21:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:21:31 GMT