- From: Bryan Rasmussen <BRS@itst.dk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:44:28 +0100
- To: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, "Mystra x64" <mystra_x64@fastmail.fm>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
>What would have been helpful I think is to either have predefined that 'xsi' >is automatically known to all XML processors (without having to do an >namespace declaration) or maybe even better, augment the xml namespace so >that you could do: > <stylesheet xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > xml:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform > http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform.xsd > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml.xsd"> >and: > xml:type > xml:nil I believe that to be extemely politically unworkable solution. The xml:schemaLocation I might agree if it was just xml:validationLocations="namespace schemalocation namespace shemalocation" but then this opens up problem with validation types not supported by various processors. xml:type and xml:nil I think, being validation specific concepts should not be put into the xml namespace. I believe you would get all sorts of rants from cranky smart people if you tried it. Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 09:47:05 UTC