Re: XSD1.1 editorial proposals

Ooops, sorry I should have checked.  Henry is right, of course.  (He's 
also esteemed too.)

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
03/16/2007 06:26 AM
 
        To:     noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
        cc:     "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, 
xmlschema-dev@w3.org
        Subject:        Re: XSD1.1 editorial proposals


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Um, sorry to contradict my esteemed colleague from IBM, but I think
the advice in the Datatypes spec. [1] is to be preferred to the other
places where comments are invited, namely:

  Comments on this document should be made in W3C's public
  installation of Bugzilla, specifying "XML Schema" as the
  product. Instructions can be found at
  http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/01/public-bugzilla. . . . Each Bugzilla
  entry and email message should contain only one comment.

Thanks for your input!

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of 
Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged 
spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+nD5kjnJixAXWBoRAsKsAJ45fJCn4WE6QVu92B1sGM9y/zXs9QCdFouC
sY+MgWmo51MqrQNi+0eed5Q=
=xmPG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 16:18:32 UTC