- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:19:13 -0000
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
I've been reading XSD 1.1 and have a number of editorial comments that I hope would make the spec easier to read. I imagine that I should submit these to www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org. One thing I'm wondering is, should I do one big long e-mail with all comments in there, or should I send one e-mail per comment? Is it worth me presenting the comments here on xml-dev first so that peers have the option to say what I'm suggesting is rubbish, thus saving the WG some effort? The really big thing I'd like to suggest is breaking the complexType section into multiple parts. This has 5 complicated intertwined use cases (if you include the <complexType><sequence> scenario) and is a major barrier to understanding XML schema. (Whereas attributes, which are trivial by comparison, have two sections; the second one not really adding much.) Would such a suggestion be automatically dismissed? Similarly, would suggesting a change in the order of sections be automatically dismissed? Thanks, Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx/ http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ =============================================
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 10:19:40 UTC