W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2007

Re: SimpleType as valid derivation of abstract type in 1.1 ?

From: Guillaume Lebleu <gl@brixlogic.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:05:04 -0500
Message-ID: <45F15B80.3040108@brixlogic.com>
To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org


Michael Kay wrote:
> I think (without checking my facts) it would also work if the base type has
> an empty content model,
SaxonSA, SQC or MSXML do not like <sequence/> or <complexContent/>.

Guillaume

Received on Friday, 9 March 2007 13:05:15 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Guillaume Lebleu: "Re: SimpleType as valid derivation of abstract type in 1.1 ?"
Previous message: Guillaume Lebleu: "Re: SimpleType as valid derivation of abstract type in 1.1 ?"
In reply to: Michael Kay: "RE: SimpleType as valid derivation of abstract type in 1.1 ?"
Next in thread: Guillaume Lebleu: "Re: SimpleType as valid derivation of abstract type in 1.1 ?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:56 GMT