W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2007

SimpleType as valid derivation of abstract type in 1.1 ?

From: Guillaume Lebleu <gl@brixlogic.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:28:57 -0500
Message-ID: <45EF58C9.5090405@brixlogic.com>
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org


Hi,

With XSD 1.0, I cannot have a simpleType deriving from an abstract type 
(since an abstract type has to be a complexType).

Will this capability be available in 1.1 ?

Thank you,

Guillaume

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 00:29:40 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wang, Zhuo: "question about group circle definition"
Previous message: dmaze@us.ibm.com: "RE: xsd:any validation for elements"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen: "Re: SimpleType as valid derivation of abstract type in 1.1 ?"
Reply: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen: "Re: SimpleType as valid derivation of abstract type in 1.1 ?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:56 GMT