W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Question about the unique element declaration inside the model groups

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:23:13 +0000
To: "Wang, Zhuo" <zhuo.wang@intel.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, "Zhang, Hongjiang" <hongjiang.zhang@intel.com>, "Yu, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.yu@intel.com>, "Moog, Thomas H" <thomas.h.moog@intel.com>
Message-ID: <f5b8xfr9zhq.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wang, Zhuo writes:


> <xs:schema> 
>          <xs:complexType name="One">
>                    <xs:sequence>
>                <xs:element name="elem1" type="xs:string" fixed="abc"/>
>                <xs:element name="elem1" type="xs:string" fixed="123"/>
>                    </xs:sequence>
>          </xs:complexType>
> </xs:schema>
>
> There are two elements with the same name "elem1" and the same target
> namespace inside the <xs:sequence>. Is this allowed? 

Local element declarations are not subject to the constraint you go on
to cite, which only applies to top-level declarations.  Since the
above two local element declarations have the same type, they are
allowed.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFuIURkjnJixAXWBoRAqdRAJsGsWBpstz7GQNxoIyXETBqI8yRJQCdE3Nz
aKE90VJry2t7wmo0TRQI1KI=
=d01Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 10:23:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:57 GMT