Hi Adam, Fortuno, Adam <Adam.Fortuno@Metavante.com> writes: > Consumer lending is different enough from mortgage lending that I would > prefer to develop a new vocabulary to handle it. However, other believe > strongly we should modify the existing schema. I would say create a new vocabulary. If the two have a substantial sub-vocabulary in common, factor it out into a base vocabulary (e.g, call it basic-lending) and reuse it in both consumer-lending and mortgage-lending. BTW, this problem is pretty similar to the OO problem of creating two separate classes vs lumping two relatively unrelated functionalities into one class. I believe the consensus in OO is to create two classes with a common base if necessary. HTH, Boris -- Boris Kolpackov Code Synthesis Tools CC http://www.codesynthesis.com Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data BindingReceived on Friday, 10 August 2007 18:16:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 March 2009 11:13:38 GMT