- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:13:23 -0400
- To: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Cc: paul.downey@bt.com, xmlschema-dev@w3c.org
Pete Cordell wrote: > After all, you'd have to get rid of xs:choice if you followed the > same logic, and to me, that is fundamental to XSD. A few years ago when schemas was first being criticised by the databinding community for having too many goofy features that were tough support, we asked which features were problematic. xsd:choice showed up on at least one list, notwithstanding that DTDs have had the same capability for years. Now, schema does indeed have too many complex features that are hard to map, in my opinion, but xsd:choice doesn't strike me as one of them. :-) For the record, I haven't heard anyone in the databinding community complaining about it lately. Cheers! -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 16:13:53 UTC