W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > October 2006

Re: SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator?

From: Jeff Rafter <lists@jeffrafter.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 03:38:31 -0700
Message-ID: <452A26A7.7040801@jeffrafter.com>
To: Bryan Rasmussen <BRS@itst.dk>
CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org

I think that is an excellent assessment Bryan. I wonder which is right? 
It is interesting that every other validator I have tried passes the 
document. I haven't tried Saxon, and it seems my Altova is broken... 
must fix that...

Thanks!
Jeff

Bryan Rasmussen wrote:
> 
> I should probably note that I don't 100% agree with this reasoning, I suppose
> that what should be processed laxly is the content of description, not any
> the sequence of elements under description. But I do think the reasoning can
> be understood.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bryan Rasmussen
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Bryan Rasmussen 
> Sendt: 9. oktober 2006 09:41
> Til: 'lists@jeffrafter.com'; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Emne: SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator?
> 
> 
> Well, if "A wildcard provides for ·validation· of attribute and element
> information items dependent on their namespace name, but independently of
> their local name." (under wildcards
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Wildcards ) Then I suppose the position is
> that a text node is not allowable as an any. 
> 
> The position is then also I suppose that Description is the element that uses
> DescriptionType, it is defined as having any number of elements in the xhtml
> namespace and processing should be lax if you happen to run into an element
> in say the RDF namespace. But here they are running into a textnode under
> description, description is not processed laxly therefore Description raises
> an error. 
> 
> 
> At any rate, this is what I figure they position is. 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Bryan Rasmussen
> 
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
> [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org]På vegne af Jeff Rafter
> Sendt: 6. oktober 2006 21:01
> Til: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Emne: Any wildcard and the .NET validator?
> 
> 
> 
> Does anyone here have information on the .NET XML Schema validator and 
> their position on lax validation of wildcards?
> 
> i.e.:
> 
>   <complexType name="DescriptionType" mixed="true">
>     <sequence>
>       <any minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"
>         namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" processContents="lax"/>
>     </sequence>
>   </complexType>
> 
>     <description xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Blah 
> Blah<html:em>blah</html:em>.<html:br/>Blah<html:strong>blah</html:strong> 
> blah!</description>
> 
> Works in everything except the .NET tools (even MSXML passes the 
> document...).
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 9 October 2006 10:52:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:55 GMT