Sorry I didn't mean, if XMLSpy reported something, it will always be correct. I meant to say .. (a) could be the answer. I wish to add that I believe, XMLSpy is a nice product. On 10/2/06, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote: > > > > I did a quick check with XMLSpy 2006. It reports this as a > > validation error. So as you say, (a) is the answer. > > > Really, trying out implementations is no way to find out what the spec says. > The answer is in Schema Part 1 section 3.5.4: > > For an attribute information item to be.valid. with respect to an attribute > use its .normalized value. must match the canonical lexical representation > of the attribute use's {value constraint} value, if it is present and fixed. > > Given <xs:attribute name="foo" type="xs:string" fixed="bar" />, there is an > attribute use with a {value constraint} that is fixed and has the value > "bar". The .normalized value. of the attribute information item is "", which > does not match. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ -- Regards, Mukul GandhiReceived on Monday, 2 October 2006 18:13:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 October 2006 18:13:09 GMT