W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2006

RE: Schema Help

From: oknam park <ponda7777@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:53:54 +0000
Message-ID: <BAY108-F21AD2BC0B789FEA0448E0BBB170@phx.gbl>
To: mike@saxonica.com, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
So, I revised gemp. and uploaded again.

I really need your help. ^^


>From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
>To: "'oknam park'" <ponda7777@hotmail.com>,<xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
>Subject: RE: Schema Help
>Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:59:17 -0000
>
>
>gemq contains references to schemas that you haven't provided, so I can't
>help you with this.
>
>Michael Kay
>http://www.saxonica.com/
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of oknam park
> > Sent: 27 January 2006 22:53
> > To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> > Subject: Schema Help
> >
> > I developed a xml schema for a set of element and a set of
> > qualifiers as
> > well as application profile.
> >
> > Seems that Schemas for element and qualifier do not have any
> > problem. But, a
> > schema for an application profile is against validation.
> >
> > I have no idea about this.
> >
> > Could you give me a tip? Here are attached files.
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Oknam
> >
> >
>
>
>



Received on Saturday, 28 January 2006 21:54:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:52 GMT