- From: George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:33:16 +0200
- To: bkbonner@gmail.com
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi Brian, Then a model like (a|b|c)+ looks like exactly what want. Best Regards, George --------------------------------------------------------------------- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com Brian Bonner wrote: > George, Michael, thanks. > > I'm sorry I wasn't complete. Yes, multiple occurrences of a, b and c > are allowed. That's a critical piece I left out. > > > So, someone could create: > > <options> > <a/> > </options> > > <options> > <a/> > <b/> > </options> > > <options> > <b/> > </options> > > <options> > <a/> > <b/> > <c/> > </options> > > and several others, > > but not: > > <options/> > > So each of them are optional, but *at least* one of them must be > specified and multiple can be specified at once. > > I think George's model which imposes ordering on the elements might do > the trick. I'll give that a shot. > > Thank you. > > Brian
Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 09:31:33 UTC