It's apparently permissible for an element with mixed content to have a default (or fixed) value. Section 3.3.1 of Part 1 says: If default is specified, and if the element being ·validated· is empty, then the canonical form of the supplied constraint value becomes the [schema normalized value] of the ·validated· element in the ·post-schema-validation infoset·. But the definition of [schema normalized value] says: 1 If clause 3.2 of Element Locally Valid (Element) (§3.3.4) and Element Default Value (§3.3.5) above have not applied and either the ·type definition· is a simple type definition or its {content type} is a simple type definition, then the ·normalized value· of the item as ·validated·. 2 otherwise ·absent·. which implies that if the type definition is a complex type with complex content, then the schema normalized value is always absent. There seems to be a contradiction here: can an element with mixed content have a [schema normalized value], or not? Furthermore, the definition of [schema normalized value] appears to say that the [schema normalized value] will always be ·absent· if Element Default Value (§3.3.5) applies, whereas Element Default Value (§3.3.5) says that in this situation the [schema normalized value] will be the canonical lexical representation of the {value constraint} value. They can't both be right... Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/Received on Monday, 2 January 2006 11:19:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 July 2006 00:13:09 GMT