Re: xs:key and nesting

The problem appears also with the latest SVN snapshot. I will report 
that on Apache Jira as soon as that will be available, now I get 
"Service Temporarily Unavailable" when trying to access Apache Jira.

Best Regards,
George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
http://www.oxygenxml.com


George Cristian Bina wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> This looks to me like a bug in Xerces 2.7.1.
> I will check that against the current Xerces SVN snapshot to see if it 
> shows the same problem and let you know.
> 
> Best Regards,
> George
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> George Cristian Bina
> <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
> http://www.oxygenxml.com
> 
> 
> richard.liu@ubs.com wrote:
>> I have the following schema:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>>     targetNamespace="http://www.ubs.com/namespace/wbml-render"
>>     xmlns:wbr="http://www.ubs.com/namespace/wbml-render"
>>     xmlns="http://www.ubs.com/namespace/wbml-render"
>> elementFormDefault="qualified"
>>     attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
>>     <xs:complexType name="footnoteExplanation">
>>         <xs:annotation>
>>             <xs:documentation>The text explaining the
>> footnote.</xs:documentation>
>>         </xs:annotation>
>>         <xs:simpleContent>
>>             <xs:extension base="xs:string"/>
>>         </xs:simpleContent>
>>     </xs:complexType>
>>     <xs:complexType name="footnote">
>>         <xs:annotation>
>>             <xs:documentation>Composed of base and
>> explanation.</xs:documentation>
>>         </xs:annotation>
>>         <xs:sequence>
>>             <xs:element name="footnoteBase" type="footnoteBase"/>
>>             <xs:element name="footnoteExplanation"
>> type="footnoteExplanation" minOccurs="0"/>
>>         </xs:sequence>
>>         <xs:attribute name="footnoteId" type="xs:NMTOKEN"
>> use="optional"/>
>>         <xs:attribute name="footnoteRef" type="xs:NMTOKEN"
>> use="optional"/>
>>     </xs:complexType>
>>     <xs:complexType name="footnoteBase" mixed="true">
>>         <xs:annotation>
>>             <xs:documentation>The text to which the footnote
>> pertains.</xs:documentation>
>>         </xs:annotation>
>>         <xs:sequence>
>>             <xs:element ref="footnote" minOccurs="0"
>> maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>         </xs:sequence>           </xs:complexType>
>>     <xs:element name="footnote" type="footnote">
>>         <!--<xs:key name="ref_or_explanation">
>>             <xs:selector xpath="."/>
>>             <xs:field xpath="wbr:footnoteExplanation | @footnoteRef"/>
>>         </xs:key>-->
>>     </xs:element>
>>     <xs:element name="para">
>>         <xs:complexType mixed="true">
>>             <xs:sequence>
>>                 <xs:element ref="footnote" minOccurs="0"
>> maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>             </xs:sequence>
>>         </xs:complexType>
>>         <xs:key name="ref_or_explanation">
>>             <xs:selector xpath=".//wbr:footnote"/>
>>             <xs:field xpath="wbr:footnoteExplanation | @footnoteRef"/>
>>         </xs:key>
>>     </xs:element>
>> </xs:schema>
>>
>> and the following XML schema instance
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <wbr:para xmlns:wbr="http://www.ubs.com/namespace/wbml-render"
>>     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>     xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ubs.com/namespace/wbml-render
>>  
>> file:/Users/richard/Documents/Work/Accessibility/Schemas/test_footnote.x
>> sd"> Now is     <wbr:footnote footnoteRef="abc">
>>         <wbr:footnoteBase>the</wbr:footnoteBase>
>>         <!--<wbr:footnoteExplanation>As Clinton said, "It depends on
>> what you mean by 'the'."</wbr:footnoteExplanation>-->
>>     </wbr:footnote> for     <wbr:footnote>
>>         <wbr:footnoteBase>
>>             <wbr:footnote>
>>                 <wbr:footnoteBase>
>>                     <wbr:footnote footnoteRef="x22">
>>                         <wbr:footnoteBase>all</wbr:footnoteBase>
>>                     </wbr:footnote> good
>>                 </wbr:footnoteBase>
>>                 <wbr:footnoteExplanation>In some inner
>> sense.</wbr:footnoteExplanation>
>>             </wbr:footnote> men
>>         </wbr:footnoteBase>
>>         <wbr:footnoteExplanation>Good women,
>> too.</wbr:footnoteExplanation>
>>     </wbr:footnote>
>> </wbr:para>
>>
>> The xs:key on the para element is supposed to ensure that each footnote
>> descendant has either a footnoteExplanation child or a footnoteRef
>> attribute.  The first footnote child of para "works" as desired (in
>> Oxygen 7, i.e., Xerces):  Uncommenting the footnoteExplanation element
>> results in an error, as does deleting the footnoteRef attribute.
>>
>> The second footnote element is rather complicated, because the model
>> permits "nesting" footnotes.  The XML seems valid:  The second footnote
>> element has a footnoteExplanation and no footnoteRef, so does its first
>> footnote descendent, and the innermost footnote has a footnoteRef
>> attribute and no footnoteExplanation.
>>
>> Nevertheless, I receive the following two error messages (I've pasted
>> the offending statement after the Location):
>>
>> SystemID:
>> /Users/richard/Documents/Work/Accessibility/Schemas/test_footnote.xml
>> Location: 18:88
>>                 <wbr:footnoteExplanation>In some inner
>> sense.</wbr:footnoteExplanation>
>> Description: E Identity constraint error:  field
>> "./wbr:footnoteExplanation|@footnoteRef" matches more than one value
>> within the scope of its selector; fields must match unique values.
>>
>> SystemID:
>> /Users/richard/Documents/Work/Accessibility/Schemas/test_footnote.xml
>> Location: 21:76
>>         <wbr:footnoteExplanation>Good women,
>> too.</wbr:footnoteExplanation>
>> Description: E Identity constraint error:  field
>> "./wbr:footnoteExplanation|@footnoteRef" matches more than one value
>> within the scope of its selector; fields must match unique values.
>>
>> Can anybody tell me what I'm missing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
>>

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2006 17:18:20 UTC